##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Educators often spend a lot of time carrying out repetitive motions of the upper limbs and prolonged standing on a daily basis, exposing them to hours of ergonomic risks. This is due to awkward postures, caused by significant deviation of some major body members from the normal neutral positions.  Poor ergonomics can lead to various Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs), which are of serious concern for workplace safety, especially in jobs that require repetitive motions. It thus became necessary to assess the stress level associated with teaching postures and the prevalent musculoskeletal discomfort in different parts of the body. In this study, ergonomic assessment of teaching personnel at an International Secondary School and University of Ibadan, Nigeria was conducted to determine the prevalent musculoskeletal discomfort in different parts of the body. The study utilised two ergonomic assessment tools- Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) and Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ) to gather qualitative and quantitative data about posture and motions during teaching activities. It was discovered that both university lecturers and secondary school teachers in Nigeria face significant ergonomic risks, primarily in the neck, shoulders, and lower back. Further comparison revealed that educators in the secondary school experienced higher severity of musculoskeletal discomfort and exposure to MSD risks, compared to those in the tertiary institution. The educators of the International School had an average REBA score of 4.57, while those at the University of Ibadan had a score of 3.73. These scores indicated a medium level of MSD risk for both groups, but the educators of the International School were at a higher risk. On comparing the CMDQ outcome, it was discovered that there were major differences in the regions where discomforts were reported. While secondary school revealed higher average scores in the neck, right shoulder, and left shoulder regions, and with the neck region having a mean score of 7.003; right shoulder having a mean score of 4.550; and left shoulder having a mean score of 1.600; outcome from University of Ibadan revealed higher mean scores in the lower back and left wrist regions, with the lower back region having a mean score of 7.450 and left wrist region having a mean score of 1.030. These scores indicated a mild to moderate level of discomfort for both groups, with each facing major discomfort in unique body regions. This research highlights the significance of ergonomic evaluation and the combination of quantitative and qualitative data to identify potential interventions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Aziz K, Shehzad A, Ali ST. Ergonomic awareness: simple solution to prevent work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). Journal of Bahria University Medical and Dental College. 2019;10(1):86-89.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  2. Brooks L, Reid CR, Allread GW, Mcgowan B, Nussbaum MA. Discussion panel examining the perpetual issue of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs)-challenges, gaps, and opportunities. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 2022;66:261-265.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  3. Mishra S, Sarkar K. Work‐related musculoskeletal disorders and associated risk factors among urban metropolitan hairdressers in India. Journal of Occupational Health. 2021;63(1):1-9.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  4. Trabajo RR, Rodríguez DC, Ahumada HT, Vázquez JS. Forced posture and repetitive movements associated with musculoskeletal disorders in dental students and teachers. Journal of Occupational Health. 2020;62(1):1-10.
     Google Scholar
  5. Hulshof CTJ, Pega F, Neupane S, Colosio C, Daams JG, Kc P, et al. The effect of occupational exposure to ergonomic risk factors on osteoarthritis of hip or knee and selected other musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO joint estimates of the work-related burden of disease and injury. Environment International. 2021;150:106-349.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  6. Mishra S, Narendra P. An overview of ergonomics. Journal of Ergonomics Research. 2020;3(1):1-3
     Google Scholar
  7. Hutchings J. What is ergonomics? Ergonomics in the dental office. In: Parker SS, editor. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell; 2022. Chapter 1:1-5.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  8. Koirala R, Nepal A. Literature review on ergonomics, ergonomics practices, and employee performance. Quest Journal of Management and Social Sciences. 2022;4:273-288.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  9. Al-Shamrani FA, Abdel Baset N. The Physical Ergonomics Body Posture In wearing bags; A Review Article. International Design Journal. 2023.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  10. Akhil P. Ergonomic assessment in the workplace. Journal of Ergonomics. 2021;11(6):1-2.
     Google Scholar
  11. Magnifica F, Colagrossi F, Aloisi A, Politi S, Peretti A. Italian version of the cornell musculoskeletal discomfort questionnaire (CMDQ-I): translation, cultural adaptation and validation. Work. 2021;69(1):119-125.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  12. Hita-Gutiérrez M, Gomez-Galan R, Díaz-Pérez M, Callejon-Ferre ÁJ. An overview of REBA method applications in the world. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17:2635-2638.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  13. Kowo SA, Akinbola OA, Popoola MA. Moderating influence of training and development on entrepreneurial performance: a case of SMEDAN Nigeria. Management Strategies. 2019;12(2):45-55.
     Google Scholar
  14. Biesta G. Outline of a theory of teaching: what teaching is, what it is for, how it works, and why it requires artistry. In: Praetorius AK, Caharalambous CY, eds. Theorizing teaching: current status and open issues. New York: Springer; 2023: 253-280.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  15. Alaagib NA, Musa OA, Saeed AM. Comparison of the effectiveness of lectures based on problems and traditional lectures in physiology teaching in Sudan. BMC MedicalEducation. 2019;19:365
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  16. Sahlabadi A. Relationship between the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders and postural status and ergonomic risk factors in the workplace. 2021;23:494-501.
     Google Scholar
  17. Ozoemena EL, Agbaje OS, Ogundu L, Ononuju AH, Umoke PCI, et al. Psychological distress, burnout, and coping strategies among Nigerian primary school teachers: a school-based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:23-27.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  18. Ogunboyo OF, Halid OY, Adigun K, Ilesanmi AO. Prevalence and determinants of low back pain among lecturers: a quantitative approach. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports. 2019;23(3):1-8.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  19. Chu ECP, Lo F-S, Bhaumik A. Plausible impact of forward head posture on upper cervical spine stability. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2020;9:2517-2520.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  20. Almeida TEN, Ferreira REDA, Bezerra LÂ, Pereira TMDM. Analysis of the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders and occupational stress in professors of a higher education institution in the state of Pernambuco. Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade. 2021;18:274-279.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  21. Shang L, editor A Systematic Approach Of Ergonomics Assessment Tool Selection.2020.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  22. Cerqueira SM, Ferreira da Silva A, Santos CP. Instrument-based ergonomic assessment: A perspective on the current state of art and future trends. 2019 IEEE 6th Portuguese Meeting on Bioengineering (ENBENG). 2019:1-4.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  23. Lowe BD, Dempsey PG, Jones ET. Ergonomics assessment methods used by ergonomics professionals. Applied ergonomics. 2019;81:102-882.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  24. Madani D, Dababneh A. Rapid entire body assessment: a literature review. Am J Eng Appl Sci. 2016;9(1):107-118.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar