##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Modeling cardiac contractility in pre-clinical catheterization laboratory settings remains an important task to collect results under controlled hemodynamic conditions, while providing an assessment of systolic and diastolic indices. Diligent hemodynamic monitoring with acute-based pressure-volume modeling uncovers early indicators of heart failure (HF). In this article, basic procedural assessments are outlined, while deeper dive into systolic index of contractility, the end systolic elastance is provided with references to older, while comparing it to novel approaches. Transient preload reduction using inferior vena cava occlusion (IVCO) is the current standardized maneuver used in hemodynamic protocols to provide an assessment of contractile responsiveness. In this article an example of standard measures from a single catheterization lab were depicted using tables and figures, giving background to transient preload reduction to assess the values of systolic cardiac contractility. Additionally, novel twists on other possible index(ices) coming from capturing ES point may well present future opportunities to collect systolic cardiac contractility. In this instance, both single beat systolic PPESPVR and IVCO using ES points present unique opportunities in this niche area of research. Final two sections of this article are dedicated to procedural steps and how to standardize execution of IVCO. Final section is reserved for analytical steps of how to visually compare systolic indices post-IVCO in case of linear and quadratic relationship.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Hibberd MG, Jewell BR. Calcium- and length-dependent force production in rat ventricular muscle. J Physiol. 1982; 329: 527-40.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  2. Adler D, Nikolic SD, Sonnenblick EH, Yellin EL. Time to dP/dtmax, a preload-independent index of contractility: open-chest dog study. Basic Res Cardiol. 1996; 91(1): 94-100.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  3. Walley KR. Left ventricular function: time-varying elastance and left ventricular aortic coupling. Crit Care. 2016; 20(1): 270.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  4. Little WC. The left ventricular dP/dtmax-end-diastolic volume relation in closed-chest dogs. Circ Res. 1985; 56(6): 808-15.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  5. Kerkhof PLM, Kuznetsova T, Ali R, Handly N. Left ventricular volume analysis as a basic tool to describe cardiac function. Adv Physiol Educ. 2018; 42(1): 130-139.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  6. Burkhoff D, Mirsky I, Suga H. Assessment of systolic and diastolic ventricular properties via pressure-volume analysis: a guide for clinical, translational, and basic researchers. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol.2005; 289(2): H501-12.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  7. Konecny F. The Left Ventricular End-Systolic Pressure Correlation with Aortic Valve Timing; a Novel Inotropic Index Description Using a Dual Pressure Catheter. Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Management.2022; 14(1): 1-16.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  8. Cannesson M, Jian Z, Chen G, Vu TQ, Hatib F. Effects of phenylephrine on cardiac output and venous return depend on the position of the heart on the Frank-Starling relationship. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012; 113(2): 281-9.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  9. Lankhaar JW, Rövekamp FA, Steendijk P, Faes TJ, Westerhof BE, Kind T, et al. Modeling the instantaneous pressure-volume relation of the left ventricle: a comparison of six models. Ann Biomed Eng. 2009; 37(9): 1710-26.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  10. Kass DA, Beyar R, Lankford E, Heard M, Maughan WL, Sagawa K. Influence of contractile state on curvilinearity of in situ end-systolic pressure-volume relations. Circulation. 1989; 79(1): 167-78.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  11. Pironet A, Desaive T, Kosta S, Lucas A, Paeme S, Collet A, et al. A multi-scale cardiovascular system model can account for the load-dependence of the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship. Biomed Eng Online. 2013; 12: 8.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  12. Burkhoff D, Sugiura S, Yue DT, Sagawa K. Contractility-dependent curvilinearity of end-systolic pressure-volume relations. Am J Physiol. 1987; 252(6 Pt 2): H1218-27.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  13. McClain LC, Wright LD, Bose RK, Spratt JA, Maier GW. Afterload sensitivity of nonlinear end-systolic pressure-volume relation vs preload recruitable stroke work in conscious dogs. J Surg Res. 1998; 75(1): 6-17.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  14. Suga H, Yasumura Y, Nozawa T, Futaki S, Tanaka N. Pressure-volume relation around zero transmural pressure in excised cross-circulated dog left ventricle. Circ Res. 1988; 63(2): 361-72.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  15. Miyahara K, Mikuniya A, Hanada H, Kanazawa T, Onodera K, Shinozaki N. Effect of inferior vena cava occlusion on left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relations in intact canine hearts modulation by the autonomic nervous system. Jpn Circ J. 1996; 60(9): 652-61.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  16. Glower DD, Spratt JA, Snow ND, Kabas JS, Davis JW, Olsen CO, et al. JS. Linearity of the Frank-Starling relationship in the intact heart: the concept of preload recruitable stroke work. Circulation. 1985; 71(5): 994-1009.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar