##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

IndoKnee is an unpowered knee assisting device designed and patented by Newndra Innovations. In this paper, we report a clinical study to characterize the reduction in load on the major muscles of the knee from the use of this device. Thirty healthy subjects without any history of knee problems underwent this trial. The protocol consists of three sets of events which are a) without IndoKnee (WOD), b) with IndoKnee at a minimum level of support (WDmin) and c) with IndoKnee at a maximum level of support (WDmax). Each set consists of five sitting and five standing activities. Surface electromyography was recorded from six major knee flexion/extension muscles, which are Bicep Femoris (BF), Semitendinosus (ST), Semimembranosus (SM), Rectus Femoris (RF), Vastus Medialis (VM) and Vastus Lateralis (VL). Paired t-tests were performed on our comparison between WOD vs WDmin and WOD vs WDmax to establish a significant difference in the EMG peak amplitudes during sitting and standing activities. The average reduction in all the six muscles for sitting activity is about 15% for both level of support and the standing activity, it is about 15% at a minimum level of support and 20% at a maximum level of support. In our investigation, IndoKnee did effectively reduce the required muscular effort for the knee flexion/extension. Thus, IndoKnee may prove to be an effective device in reducing knee pain, supporting osteoarthritis patients and faster rehabilitation from knee injuries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. U. S. D. T. Nguyen, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhu, J. Niu, B. Zhang, and D. T. Felson, “Increasing prevalence of knee pain and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: Survey and cohort data,” Ann. Intern. Med., vol. 155, no. 11, pp. 725–732, 2011.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  2. C. Jinks, K. Jordan, and P. Croft, “Measuring the population impact of knee pain and disability with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC),” Pain, vol. 100, no. 1–2, pp. 55–64, 2002.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  3. L. R. Olson, S. E. S. Crawford, and J. L. Guth, “Changing issue agendas of women clergy,” J. Sci. Study Relig., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 140–153, 2000.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  4. D. T. Felson and Y. Zhang, “An update on the epidemiology of knee and hip osteoarthritis with a view to prevention,” Arthritis Rheum., vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 1343–1355, 1998.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  5. N. Yoshimura, S. Muraki, K. Nakamura, and S. Tanaka, “Epidemiology of the locomotive syndrome: The research on osteoarthritis/osteoporosis against disability study 2005–2015,” Mod. Rheumatol., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2017.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  6. M. Cross et al., “The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: Estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study,” Ann. Rheum. Dis., vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 1323–1330, 2014.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  7. H. Ito et al., “Low back pain precedes the development of new knee pain in the elderly population; A novel predictive score from a longitudinal cohort study,” Arthritis Res. Ther., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2019.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  8. C. Woods, R. D. Hawkins, S. Maltby, M. Hulse, A. Thomas, and A. Hodson, “The Football Association Medical Research Programme: An audit of injuries in professional football - Analysis of hamstring injuries,” Br. J. Sports Med., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 36–41, 2004.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  9. J. H. M. Brooks, C. W. Fuller, S. P. T. Kemp, and D. B. Reddin, “Incidence, risk, and prevention of hamstring muscle injuries in professional rugby union,” Am. J. Sports Med., vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1297–1306, 2006.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  10. M. C. C. W. Elliott, B. Zarins, J. W. Powell, and C. D. Kenyon, “Hamstring muscle strains in professional football players: A 10-year review,” Am. J. Sports Med., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 843–850, 2011.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  11. N. Malliaropoulos, T. Isinkaye, K. Tsitas, and N. Maffulli, “Reinjury after acute posterior thigh muscle injuries in elite track and field athletes,” Am. J. Sports Med., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 304–310, 2011.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  12. familydoctor editorial staff, “Knee Bracing : What Works ?,” familydoctor.org, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://familydoctor.org/knee-bracing-what-works/.
     Google Scholar
  13. F. E. Pollo, J. C. Otis, S. I. Backus, R. F. Warren, and T. L. Wickiewicz, “Reduction of Medial Compartment Loads with Valgus Bracing of the Osteoarthritic Knee,” Am. J. ofSports Med., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 414–421, 2002.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  14. D. A. Dennis, R. D. Komistek, M. C. Nadaud, and M. Mahfouz, “Evaluation of Off-Loading Braces for Treatment of Unicompartmental Knee Arthrosis,” J. Arthroplasty, vol. 21, no. 4 SUPPL., pp. 2–8, 2006.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  15. H. Matsuno, K. M. Kadowaki, and H. Tsuji, “Generation II knee bracing for severe medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee,” Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., vol. 78, no. 7, pp. 745–749, 1997.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  16. R. D. Komistek, “An In Vivo Analysis of the Effectiveness of the Osteoarthritic Knee Brace During Heel-Strike of Gait,” J. Arthroplasty, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 738–742, 1999.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  17. T. B. Birmingham, J. F. Kramer, and A. Kirkley, “Effect of a functional knee brace on knee flexion and extension strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction,” Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., vol. 83, no. 10, pp. 1472–1475, 2002.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  18. D. Van Tiggelen, E. Witvrouw, P. Roget, D. Cambier, L. Danneels, and R. Verdonk, “Effect of bracing on the prevention of anterior knee pain - A prospective randomized study,” Knee Surgery, Sport. Traumatol. Arthrosc., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 434–439, 2004.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  19. S. Brandsson, E. Faxén, J. file:///C:/Users/PM. L.-9/Downloads/Tiggelen2004_Article_EffectOfBracingOnThePrevention. pd. Kartus, B. I. Eriksson, and J. Karlsson, “Is a knee brace advantageous after anterior cruciate ligament surgery? A prospective, randomised study with a two-year follow-up,” Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sport., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 110–114, 2001.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  20. G. K. H. Wu, G. Y. F. Ng, and A. F. T. Mak, “Effects of knee bracing on the functional performance of patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction,” Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 282–285, 2001.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  21. C. Beck, D. Drez, J. Young, W. D. Cannon, and M. L. Stone, “Instrumented testing of functional knee braces,” Am. J. Sports Med., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 253–256, 1986.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  22. G. R. Jangir, “A TORQUE ADJUSTING MECHANICAL ASSEMBLY IN APPARATUS FOR BODY SUPPORT,” WO/2018/178897, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  23. A. L. Hof, “The relationship between electromyogram and muscle force,” Sport. Sport., vol. 11, no. 03, pp. 79–86, 1997.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  24. G. Marco, B. Alberto, and T. M. Vieira, “Surface EMG and muscle fatigue: Multi-channel approaches to the study of myoelectric manifestations of muscle fatigue,” Physiol. Meas., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. R27–R60, 2017.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  25. H. J. Hermens et al., “European Recommendations for Surface ElectroMyoGraphy,” Roessingh Res. Dev., pp. 8–11, 1999.
     Google Scholar
  26. W. Rose, “Electromyogram analysis,” Online course Mater. Univ. Delaware. Retrieved July, 5, 2016., 2011.
     Google Scholar