Jules Bordet Institute, Belgium
* Corresponding author
Jules Bordet Institute, Belgium
Erasmus Hospital, Belgium

Article Main Content

Metastatic spread of uterine cancer is generally infrequent and late, mainly involving lymph nodes, lung, bone and liver. We report the case of a 55-year-old woman who underwent conization for microinvasive cervical cancer in 2005. In 2014, a confirmed local and oligo-metastatic bone relapse of invasive squamous cell carcinoma, treated with radio-chemotherapy and orthopaedic surgery to stabilize the bone lesion, and the patient was placed under surveillance. Two years later, lymph node progression was confirmed, and the patient was put on chemotherapy with targeted therapy. Further progression led to several lines of treatment. In 10/2023, she presented to the emergency room with deteriorating general condition and a clinical syndrome of intracranial hypertension. A brain MRI revealed two cerebral metastatic lesions with signs of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, which was confirmed by cerebrospinal fluid cytology. The patient was admitted to the intensive care unit, but died five days later after the start of her encephalic radiotherapy. In this article, we present the clinical, histological and therapeutic aspects of this localization, together with a review of the literature.

Background

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) is defined by the spread of cancer cells to the central nervous system (CNS) and the creation of secondary lesions inside the thin membranes defending the brain [1].

LC is an uncommon but lethal cancer complication; without adequate therapy, the median survival time is only 6–8 weeks [2].

Leptomeningeal disease can result from original central nervous system malignancies or secondary metastatic disease from primary tumor locations outside the central nervous system [3].

Breast cancer, as well as lung cancer and melanoma, are the most common causes of leptomeningeal metastases [4], [5].

Meningeal carcinomatosis caused by malignant uterine cervix tumors is exceedingly rare, with only a few cases reported in the literature [2].

We present a clinical case of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis to show the diagnosis and clinical presentation of it, and to emphasize the importance of population-based cervical cancer screening programs.

Clinical Case

We report the case of a 55-year-old woman, treated in 2015 for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in remission, who underwent conization of microinvasive cervical cancer in 2005.

In 2015, following pain in the left lower limb and weight loss of 10 kg in 6 months, an X-ray of the pelvis showed a vast area of bone lysis on the lateral side of the left iliac bone. A surgical bone biopsy in August 2015 revealed an HPV-positive squamous cell carcinoma. A PET-scanner extension workup showed an intensely hypermetabolic pelvic mass developed in the soft tissues of the medial aspect of the left iliac crest, causing bone lysis, with no other bone lesions. On pelvic MRI, a left iliac bone mass with cortical effraction, with infiltration of the left iliac muscle and muscle.

She underwent cisplatin-based pelvic radio-chemotherapy and orthopedic surgery for acetabulum stabilization and subsequent monitoring. Two years later, after confirmation of axillary and supra-clavicular lymph node progression, she received paclitaxel-cisplatin-bevacizumab-based treatment, followed by bevacizumab maintenance until the end of 2017.

At progression in 2020, the same immuno-chemotherapy was resumed until March 2022, with further lymph node progression. The patient was included in the Tisotumab Vedotin arm of the ENGOT cx12 trial, which was stopped due to disease progression in bone and lymph nodes. She then received a new line of chemotherapy based on paclitaxel and cisplatin, followed, in the event of progression in August 2023, by cemiplimab-based immunotherapy.

In October 2023, the patient was taken to the emergency room because of deteriorating general state, headache, and vomiting indicative of intracranial hypertension. A brain MRI revealed two cerebral metastatic lesions with signs of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (Fig. 1), which was confirmed by cerebrospinal fluid cytology (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1. Right occipital lesion measuring 1.5 × 1 cm with ring enhancement, no significant mass effect or vasogenic oedema. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis.

Fig. 2. Immunohistochemical staining of a cerebrospinal fluid cytology specimen showing p16-positive atypical cells, fairly conclusive for metastatic cancer from the uterine cervix.

The patient was admitted to the intensive care unit but died five days later after the initiation of whole brain irradiation.

Discussion

Cervical cancer is one of the most frequent malignancies in women, ranking fourth after breast, colorectal, and lung cancer [6]. It is now recognized as a rare, long-term result of chronic infection of the lower genital tract with one of the 15 high-risk HPV varieties, which is considered to be the primary cause of cervical cancer [7].

These discoveries have led to the development of new proactive and early detection efforts with two approaches: preventing invasive cancer by HPV vaccination and screening for precancerous lesions [8].

The 5-year survival rate for metastatic cervical cancer is 16.5%, compared to 91.5% for localized disease [9].

Cervical leptomeningeal meningeal diseases (LMD) are extremely infrequent 0.4%–2.3% and are typically considered incurable [10]. Patients with cervical cancer-related LMD have a dismal prognosis, particularly if they are diagnosed late in the disease’s progression.

As of this writing, the literature records 27 cases; in this case study, we report the 28th patient (Table I).

Case N Histology Initial stage Primary TRT Other metastasis Time to LM diagnosis Treatment for LM Survival after LM
#1 SCC Localized N/A LNs (cervical, pelvic) 25 weeks N/A 17 weeks
#2 SCC Localized N/A Brain, buttock 190 weeks N/A 9 weeks
#3 ASC Localized N/A Lung, brain 228 weeks N/A 46 weeks
#4 AC Localized N/A Cervix, endometrium 9 weeks N/A 14 weeks
#5 NEC Localized Surgery SC Breast, lung, LNs (mediastinum, abdominal) 19 months RT 2 weeks
#6 SCC Localized Surgery RT LNs (pelvic), Bone 836 weeks RT 12 weeks
#7 SCC Localized RT LNs (pelvic, PA) 39 months SC 2 weeks
ITC
#8 SCC Metastatic SC Lung 6 weeks Supportive care (analgesics) 2 weeks
RT
#9 SCC Localized Surgery SC N/A 56 weeks RT 4 weeks
#10 AC Localized RT LNs (PA, SCF) 2 years ITC 1 week
RT
#11 ASC Localized RT Bone 52 weeks RT 8 weeks
SC
#12 SCC Localized CRT LNs (SCF) 2 years ITC 13 weeks
#13 ASC Metastatic SC None At diagnosis ITC 35 weeks
RT
SC
#14 SCC Localized CRT + Surgery Brain, lung, LNs, vagina 58weeks RT 3 weeks
#15 ASC Localized CRT Liver 31 months RT 8 weeks
#16 NEC Localized CRT Brain, bone, liver, mediastinum 19 months RT 28 weeks
SC
#17 SCC Metastatic N/A None At diagnosis N/A N/A
#18 SCC Localized CRT Bone, sciatic nerve 10 months N/A N/A
#19 SCC Localized CRT LNs (PA, SCF) 34 months ITC 26 weeks
RT
#20 SCC Localized CRT Lung, liver, peritoneum, skin 35 weeks RT N/A
#21 NEC Metastatic N/A None At diagnosis N/A N/A
#22 SCC Localized Surgery LNs (PA, pelvic) 13 years RT 9 weeks
ITC
#23 NEC Metastatic SC Bone, LNs (pelvic, PA) 2 weeks None 2 weeks
#24 AC Localized SC + CRT LNs (PA, pelvic) 10 months Palliative therapy 7 weeks
#25 SCC Metastatic SC LNs (pelvic, PA) At diagnosis RT 20 weeks
SC
#26 SCC Localized Surgery RT Lung, LNs (neck, mediastinum, axilla) 240 weeks RT 3 weeks
#27 SCC Metastatic SC + CRT Bone, liver, LNs (pelvic, PA) 68 weeks ITC 12 weeks
RT
#28Our case SCC Localized CRT Bone, nodes, brain 18 years RT immunotherapy 3 weeks
Table I. Cervical Cancer Patients with Leptomeningeal Metastasis (LM) [11], [12]

Headaches, altered mental state, back pain or radiculalgia, nausea, vomiting, limb weakness, sensory abnormalities, diplopia, dysphagia, dysarthria, and incoordination are the most common clinical presentations. The most prevalent symptoms are spinal (>60%), followed by cerebral (50%) and cranial nerve symptoms (40%) [4].

Despite the strong clinical suspicion of leptomeningeal metastases, diagnosis remains difficult.

MRI with contrast is the standard assessment for the diagnosis of LMC. Given the prevalence of multifocal involvement, imaging of the whole neuraxis is required. Most patients exhibit leptomeningeal enhancement, which is regularly paired with nerve enhancement. MRI may thus have diagnostic significance, especially if CSF cytology is negative. Despite this, a negative MRI following a negative CSF doesn’t rule out LMC [13], [14].

Confirmation requires the discovery of malignant cells in the CSF during cytological examination, but at least 3 lumbar punctures may be necessary to establish the diagnosis [15]. Cytological results may be falsely negative, which may be due to the strong adhesion of malignant cells to the leptomeninges or to the presence of a focal rather than generalized leptomeningeal tumor [16].

There is currently no viable or successful standardized therapy for LMD patients [17], carcinomatous meningitis is difficult to treat, however detecting it early can increase patient survival [18].

For all the cases recorded until now, multimodal treatment combinations including systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy, as well as radiation (RT), were employed [11]. Topotecan, etoposide, docetaxel, cisplatin, and cisplatin with ifosfamide were among the chemotherapy protocols used [9]. Whole brain radiotherapy is used to treat leptomeningeal disease by relieving symptoms and improving neurological functioning caused by cranial involvement.

The concomitant intrathecal chemotherapy with radiotherapy for LM raises greater concerns because of the likelihood of harm [19], [20], consequently, it should be avoided. Despite these intensive treatment combinations, the literature reports a median survival time of 4–8 weeks following the discovery of leptomeningeal metastases (LM). Given that LM patients have a short life expectancy, every effort must be taken to prevent reducing their quality of life and causing further, potentially fatal, toxicity.

Conclusion

In summary, our case report brings to light an extremely uncommon clinical situation involving an invasive cervical squamous cell carcinoma with a poor prognosis that could have been prevented or detected earlier.

This emphasizes two key points: first, the significance of structured cervical cancer screening, conducted in an environment that provides high-quality follow-up, for successful disease prevention; and second, the importance of paying close attention to neurological symptoms and meningeal irritation indicators.

References

  1. Zorzato P, Zambon M, Gori S, Frayle H, Gervasi MT, Del Mistro A. Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis of a poorly differentiated cervical carcinoma caused by human papillomavirus type 18. Viruses [Internet]. 2021 Feb [cited 2024 Jun 25];13(2):307. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/2/307.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  2. Liu C, Zhang Y, Li Y, Bu H, Meng Z, Ji Y, et al. A rare magnetic resonance imaging pattern of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis: a case description. Quant Imaging Med Surg [Internet]. 2021 Jul [cited 2024 Jun 25];11(7):3367–70. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8250035/.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  3. Patterson JD, Farach AM, Singh M, Britz GW, Rostomily RC. Leptomeningeal metastasis from neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: illustrative case. J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2023 Jan 30;5(5):CASE22457.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  4. Pattanaik J, Goel V, Sehrawat P, Rathore R, Singh RK, Garg A, et al. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in a patient with recurrent unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the retromolar trigone—a brief report. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst [Internet]. 2022 Dec [cited 2024 Jun 24];34(1):1–9. Available from: https://jenci.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s43046-022-00147-y.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  5. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7–34.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  6. Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN, Sankaranarayanan R. Cancer of the cervix uteri. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2024 Aug 8];143(S2):22–36. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ijgo.12611.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  7. Bosch FX, Lorincz A, Muñoz N, Meijer CJLM, Shah KV. The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2002 Apr;55(4):244–65.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  8. Viveros-Carreño D, Fernandes A, Pareja R. Updates on cervical cancer prevention. Int J GynecolCancer. 2023 Mar 6;33(3):394–402.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  9. Li H, Wu X, Cheng X. Advances in diagnosis and treatment of metastatic cervical cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. 2016 May 9 [cited 2024 Aug 8];27(4):10–1. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2016.27.e43.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  10. Divine LM, Kizer NT, Hagemann AR, Pittman ME, Chen L, Powell MA, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and survival of patients with gynecologic malignancies metastatic to the brain. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Jul;142(1):76–82.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  11. Kahvecioglu A, Sari SY, Yildirim HC, Arik Z, Gultekin M, Yildiz F. Leptomeningeal metastasis in primary uterine cervical cancer: a rare case and review of the literature. Oncology in Clinical Practice [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Jan 25];19(3):184–9. Available from: https://journals.viamedica.pl/oncology_in_clinical_practice/article/view/OCP.2023.0010.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  12. Chamberlain MC, Tsao-Wei DD, Groshen S. Neoplastic meningitis-related encephalopathy: prognostic significance. Neurology. 2004;63(12):2159–61. Available from: http://ouci.dntb.gov.ua/en/works/7XeoxEp4/.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  13. Hildebrand J, Aoun M. Chronic meningitis: still a diagnostic challenge. J Neurol. 2003 Jun;250(6):653–60.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  14. Straathof CS, de Bruin HG, Dippel DW, Vecht CJ. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and cerebrospinal fluid cytology in leptomeningeal metastasis. J Neurol. 1999 Sep;246(9):810–4.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  15. Infiltration of the leptomeninges by systemic cancer. A clinical and pathologic study—PubMed [Internet]. [cited 2024Aug 8]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4405841/.
     Google Scholar
  16. WasserstromWR, Glass JP, Posner JB. Diagnosis and treatment of leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors: experience with 90 patients. Cancer. 1982 Feb 15;49(4):759–72.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  17. Sperduto PW, Berkey B, Gaspar LE, Mehta M, Curran W. A new prognostic index and comparison to three other indices for patients with brain metastases: an analysis of 1,960 patients in the RTOG database. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Feb 1;70(2):510–4. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17931798/.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  18. Tasaki K, Terada A, Nishida N, Murakami F. Carcinomatous meningitis from recurrent glassy cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix—a case report. J Obstet Gynaecol Res [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 Aug 12];47(9):3396–400. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jog.14885.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  19. Pan Z, Yang G, He H, Zhao G, Yuan T, Li Y, et al. Concurrent radiotherapy and intrathecal methotrexate for treating leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumors with adverse prognostic factors: a prospective and single-arm study. Int J Cancer. 2016 Oct 15;139(8):1864–72.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  20. Mack F, Baumert BG, Schäfer N, Hattingen E, Scheffler B, Herrlinger U, et al. Therapy of leptomeningeal metastasis in solid tumors. Cancer Treat Rev [Internet]. 2016 Feb 1 [cited 2024 Aug 19];43:83–91. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0305737215002509.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar


Most read articles by the same author(s)