##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Optimal antenatal care (ANC) opens the windows of opportunities for timely identification and interventions for the prevention of maternal and foetal morbidity and mortality. The objectives were to determine the antenatal care utilisation patterns and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes. A retrospective cohort study of all women giving childbirths between January 2018 to September 2019 at a midwife obstetric unit was undertaken. All variables were significant on bivariate analysis (p<0.05) were included in the multivariate model and the significant results were expressed with adjusted odds ratios (OR) and p values. Most (94.4%) of the pregnant women received antenatal care, 76% had > 4 and only 24.9% had > 8 ANC visits. Half (52.5%) of them had booking visit at or before 20 weeks gestation. There was no maternal death.  Low birthweight (LBW), stillbirth and neonatal death rates were 9%, 17 and 7 per 1000 live births respectively. The number of antenatal visit was a significant predictor for stillbirth, neonatal death and LBW. Women who did not attend ANC were 22 times (OR=21.8, 95% CI: 2.51: 189.24, p=0.005), 17 times (OR=17.31, 95% CI; 1.9:157.1, p=0.001) and 11 times (OR=11.0, 95% CI; 5.4:22.19, p=0.000) more likely to have stillbirths, neonatal deaths and LBW respectively. Increasing the number of ANC visits decreased the likelihood of stillbirth, neonatal death and LBW. Few pregnant women received > 8 ANC visits. Higher numbers of ANC visits were positively associated with decreased occurrences of LBW, still births and neonatal deaths. Strengthening the ANC services should be prioritised in SA.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience, WHO 2016.
     Google Scholar
  2. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: WHO, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  3. WHO L. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. WHO Recomm. Antenatal care Posit. pregnancy Exp. 2016 Oct 24.
     Google Scholar
  4. World Health Organization. Provision of effective antenatal care: Integrated Management of Pregnancy and Childbirth (IMPAC). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
     Google Scholar
  5. National Department of Health, Guidelines for Maternity Care in South Africa—A Manual for Clinics, Community Health Centers and District Hospitals, Department of Health, Pretoria, South Africa, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  6. Saving Mothers 2014–2016: seventh triennial report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in South Africa: short report. Pretoria: National Committee for the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths; 2019.
     Google Scholar
  7. The Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescents’ Health (2016–2030). New York: United Nations; 2015.
     Google Scholar
  8. Hofmeyr GJ, Mentrop L. Time for ‘basic antenatal care plus’ in South Africa? S Afr Med J. 2015; (11): 902–903.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  9. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Jassir FB. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet Global Health. 2016;4(3):164.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  10. Vintzileos AM, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Scorza WE, Knuppel RA. The impact of prenatal care in the United States on preterm births in the presence and absence of antenatal high-risk conditions. AJOG. 2002; 187(5): 1254-7.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  11. Zhang B, Yang R, Liang SW, Wang J, Chang JJ, Hu K, et al. Association between prenatal care utilization and risk of preterm birth among Chinese women. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2017; 37: 605–611.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  12. Pervin J, Rahman SM, Rahman M, Aktar S, Rahman A, et al. Association between antenatal care visit and preterm birth: a cohort study in rural Bangladesh. BMJ Open. 2020; 10.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  13. Govender T, Reddy P, Ghuman S. Obstetric outcomes and antenatal access among adolescent pregnancies in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. SAFP. 2018; 60.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  14. Lavin T, Preen DB, Pattinson R. Timing and cause of perinatal mortality for small-for-gestational-age babies in South Africa: critical periods and challenges with detection. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2016; 2: 11.
     Google Scholar
  15. Lavin T, Pattinson RC. Does antenatal care timing influence stillbirth risk in the third trimester? A secondary analysis of perinatal death audit data in South Africa. BJOG. 2018; (2): 140–147.
     Google Scholar
  16. Statistics South Africa. Maternal Health Indicators: Further Analysis of the 1998 and 2016 South Africa Demographic and Health Surveys. Statistics South Africa. Pretoria: 2020.
     Google Scholar
  17. WHO. Strategies toward ending preventable maternal mortality (EPMM)). Geneva: WHO, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  18. South African Institute of Race Relations. Race relations in South Africa, Reasons for Hope. [Internet] 2019. [cited 2020 October 10] Available from: https://irr.org.za/reports/occasional-reports/files/reasons-for-hope-report-final.pdf
     Google Scholar
  19. National Department of Health (NDOH), Statistics South Africa (Stats SA), South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC), and ICF. 2019. South Africa Demographic and Health Survey 2016. Pretoria, South Africa, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NDOH, Stats SA, SAMRC, and ICF 2019.
     Google Scholar
  20. Sibiya MN, Ngxongo TS, Reddy P. Timing of first antenatal care attendance and associated factors among pregnant women in an obstetric health facility in eThekwini district, KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa. AJPHES. 2018; (2): 181–192.
     Google Scholar
  21. Zhao QI, Huang ZJ, Yang S, Pan J, Smith B & Xu B. The utilization of antenatal care among rural-to-urban migrant women in Shanghai: a hospital-based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2012; (12): 10-12.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  22. Mulondo SA. Factors associated with underutilisation of antenatal care services in Limpopo, South Africa. BJM 2020; (11):788-795.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  23. Hlongwane TM, Bozkurt B, Barreix MC, Pattinson R, Gülmezoglu M, Vannevel V, et al. Implementing antenatal care recommendations, South Africa. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2021; (3): 220.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  24. Konje ET, Magoma MT, Hatfield J, Kuhn S, Sauve RS. Missed opportunities in antenatal care for improving the health of pregnant women and newborns in Geita district, Northwest Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2018; (1): 1-3.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  25. Hu W, Hu H, Zhao W, Huang A, Yang Q, Di J. Current status of antenatal care of pregnant women-8 provinces in China, 2018. BMC Public Health. 2018; (21): 11-35.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  26. Ebonwu J, Mumbauer A, Uys M, Wainberg ML, Medina-Marino A. Determinants of late antenatal care presentation in rural and peri-urban communities in South Africa: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2018; 13.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  27. Hoque AM, Hoque ME, Van Hal G. Trends of Pregnancy Outcomes from 2013 to 2017 at a Primary Health Care Facility in Durban, South Africa. J Clin Case Rep. 2020; 3(2): 1028.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  28. Taha Z, Ali Hassan A, Wikkeling-Scott L, Papandreou D. Factors Associated with Preterm Birth and Low Birth Weight in Abu Dhabi, the United Arab Emirates. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; (17): 1382.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  29. Momeni M, Danaei M, Kermani AJ, Bakhshandeh M, Foroodnia S, Mahmoudabadi Z, et al. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Low Birth Weight in the Southeast of Iran. Int J Prev Med. 2017; (8): 12.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  30. Tali A, Taddele M, Alemayehu M. Magnitude of Low Birth Weight and Associated Factors among Newborns Delivered in Dangla Primary Hospital, Amhara Regional State, Northwest Ethiopia, 2017. J Pregnancy. 2019; (35): 723-729.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  31. Hassan AA, Abubaker MS, Radi EA, Adam I. Education, prenatal care, and poor perinatal outcome in Khartoum, Sudan. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009; (105): 66-67.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  32. Zini ME, Omo-Aghoja LO. Clinical and sociodemographic correlates of preterm deliveries in two tertiary hospitals in southern Nigeria. Ghana Med J. 2019; (53): 20-28.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  33. Saleem S, McClure EM, Shivaprasad S, Archana P, Fabian E, Anaa G, et al. A prospective study of maternal, fetal and neonatal deaths in low- and middle-income countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2014; (92): 605-612.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  34. Harrison A, Montgomery ET, Laurie M, Wilkinson D. Barriers to implementing South Africa’s Termination of Pregnancy Act in rural KwaZulu-Natal. Health Policy Plan. 2000; (15): 424-431.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  35. Lavin T, Preen DB, Pattinson R. Timing and cause of perinatal mortality for small-for-gestational-age babies in South Africa: critical periods and challenges with detection. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2016; 2(1): 11.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  36. Lavin T, Pattinson RC. Does antenatal care timing influence stillbirth risk in the third trimester? A secondary analysis of perinatal death audit data in South Africa. BJOG. 2018; 125(2): 140–147.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  37. Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Bahl R, Lawn JE, Salam RA, Paul VK, et al. Can available interventions end preventable deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost? Lancet. 2014; (384): 347–370.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  38. De Lange TE, Budde MP, Heard AR, Tucker G, Kennare R, Dekker GA. Avoidable risk factors in perinatal deaths: a perinatal audit in South Australia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008; (1): 50–57.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  39. Dowswell T, Carroli G, Duley L, Gates S, Gülmezoglu AM, Khan‐Neelofur D, et al. Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; 10.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar